Granites and Earth Evolution.
Prev Up Next

GEOCHRMICAL FEATURES OF THE SOUTH-EASTERN PART OF EAST SAYAN

GOLD-BEARING GRANITES


Damdinov B.B.

Geological Institute SB RAS, Ulan-Ude, Russia, damdinov@gin.bscnet.ru


South-eastern part of East Sayan granitoids are consolidated to some differently aged granitic complexes. Among Archean and Early Paleozoic intrusions by belsky, kitoisky and onotsky migmatite-plagiogneisogranitic complexes are distinguished. Middle and Late Proterozoic intrusions are presented by uriksky, sumsunursky, sayansky and holbinsky granitoid complexes. Paleozoic granitic intrusions are divided to tannuolsky, sarchoisky, and ognitsky complexes. However, using A.B.Kuz’michev data (2004) occurrences of granitic magmatism attached to tectonic events. Different Early Paleozoic granitoids of Tuva-Mongolian massif, which early were divided to sarchoisky, ognitsky and sumsunursky complexes, are combined to the postcollision granitic magmatism related to the Tuva-Mongolian microcontinent with craton and island-arc terranes collision. Whereas sumsunursky and holbisky complex tonalities and trondiemites have a Late Riphean age and relate to the active continental margin magmatism of the Tuva-Mongolian microcontinent.

Last investigations allow revealing some gold deposits in the Riphean and Early Paleozoic granitoids of the south-eastern part of East Sayan. However, as a result of granitoid bad study, the granite typification problem appeared. Distinguished granitoid complexes are differently interpreted by different researchers, especially it refers to the Oka structure-formation zone granitoides. Furthermore grantoid massifs age is not reliable determined. Existent dating is carried for single massifs and has a fragmentary character.

Granite-related gold mineralization represented by two geochemical types: gold-telluric and gold-bismuth. Gold-telluric type deposits confined to the Last-Riphean tonalite-plagiogranites (Tissa-Sarchoy ore zone), whereas gold-bismuth type deposit is related to Early-Middle Paleozoic two-feldspar leukogranites (Pogranichnoe deposit). These leukogranites are referred to the sarchoisky complex by some features. The tonalite-plagiogranite attribute to some granitic complex is still unclear. In sixteen ages of twenties century these granites were considered as the horingolsky volcano-plutonic complex. Later, they were referred to the tannuolsky granitic complex. Mainly it is connected with the absence of the studied granite massifs reliable dating.

We carried out investigations of the absolute age using Rb-Sr method on the gross granite composition (analysist V.F.Posokhov, GIN SB RAS). Tissa-Sarchoi ore zone granitoids have a 633±140 Ma age, with a 0.70448 primary Sr-ratio. Pogranichnoe deposit granites age has a 440-525 Ma values, with a 0.7050 primary Sr-ratio. Studied granites are distinctly divided to the island-arc (Tissa-Sarchoi ore zone) and postcollision (Pogranichnoe deposit) granites by geochemical features.

The post collision magmatism, presented by tannuolsky granitic complex in this region, aged as 451±5.7 Ma determined by U-Pb-method (Kozakov et al., 1998). Most probably, studied sarchoisky complex granites have a similar age taking into consideration its dating and granite geochemical features.

Gold-telluric mineralization bearing plagiogranites are older and comparable with Last Riphean island arc plagiogranites of the Kuznets Alatau, which have age value about 800 Ma, taking high dispersion of Rb-Sr dating age (Rudnev et al. 2006). Using Yb-Eu and Yb-Sr correlation diagrams, we determined that plagiogranite formation was a result of plagioclase-hornblende (gabbroidic) paragenesis melting in 1000ºC temperature and 8 kbar pressure conditions (Turkina, 2000). These conditions are corresponding to oceanic plate melting in subduction zone.

Thus, Last Riphean island-arc and Middle Paleozoic postcollision granites have a different metallogenic specialilazation. Island-arc plagiogranites contain gold-telluric mineralization, whereas postcollision leukogranites contain gold-bismuth mineralization. Formation of both types of gold deposits is genetically related to granites, that were established by our and N.A.Goryachev, G.N.Gamyanin et al. investigations (Gamyanin et al., 1998; Gryachev, Gamyanin, 2006; Damdinov et al., 2007 et al.).

Investigations was supported by RFBR grant (¹06-05-64993).


References

Gamyanin G.N., Goncharov V.I., Goryachev N.A. Gold-rare metal deposits of the North-East of Russia. // Pacific Geology. 1998, vol.17, ¹3, P.94 – 103 (in Russian).

Goryachev N.A., Gamyanin G.N. Gold-bismuth (gold-rare metal) deposits of the North-East of Russia: types and prospects of industrial developing. // Gold deposits of the East of Russia. Magadan.: SVKNII DVO RAN. 2006, P.50 – 62 (in Russian).

Damdinov B.B., Mironov A.G., Borisenko A.S., Guntypov B.B., Karmanov N.S., Borovikov A.A., Garmaev B.L. Composition and formation conditions of gold-telluride type mineralization in the Tissa-Sarchoi gold-bearing province (East Sayan). // Geology and Geophysics. 2007, vol. 48, ¹8, P.833 – 847 (in Russian).

Kozakov I.K., Salnikova E.B., Kovalenko V.I., Kotov A.B., Lebedev V.I., Sugorakova A.M., Yakovleva S.Z. Postcollison magmatism age of the Early Caledonides of Central Asia (in Tuva example). // Doklady RAN. 1998, vol.360, ¹4, P.514 – 517 (in Russian).

Kuz’michev A.B. Tectonic history of the Tuva-Mongolian massif: Early Baikalian, Late Baikalian and Early Caledonian stages.// Moscow: Probel-2000. 2004, 192p. (in Russian).

Rudnev S.N., Matukov D.I., Sergeev S.A., Serov P.A. Late Riphean plagiogranites of the Kuznets Alatau: composition, age and sources. // Doklady RAN. 2006, vol.410, ¹6, P.809 – 815 (in Russian).

Turkina O.M. Model geochemical types of the tonalite-trondiemite melts and its natural equivalents. // Geochemistry. 2007, ¹7, P.704 – 717 (in Russian).



Prev Up Next