A COLLISION OROGENY AND
FORMATION OF GRANITOID BATHOLITHES
Rusin A.I.
Institute
of Geology and Geochemistry UrB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia,
rusin@igg.uran.ru
When
paradigm of Earth contraction was predominant, the regional
metamorphism, granite batholith intrusions and alpine-type folding
was considered as interrelated and sometime independent
manifestation of orogeny. The plate tectonics introduced the new
understanding of orogeny as a consequence of oceanic and/or
continental plate collision. That interpretation allowed to
demonstrate variety of collision environments (Miyashro et al.,
1982) and to confine the using of actualism in paleodynamic
reconstruction as well as relationship between magmatic, metamorphic
and deformation processes in orogenic belts. It was made a
conclusion, that high- and ultra-high-pressure eclogite and
glaucophan-schist metamorphism are characteristic for collision
orogens and formation of granite belts relates to high-gradient
middle- and low-pressure metamorphism (Rusin, 2007). Their
conjunction clearly manifests in the surface exhibition of
subduction zones - island arcs and continental margins. It is
believe that the deep plunge of hydration oceanic crust is the main
reason of above-subduction andesite volcanism but there are
disageements in understanding of tonalite-trondhjemite series
generation.
The
west margin of American continent with huge number of basic
granitoid batholiths is a standard example of above-subduction
granitoid belt conjugated with volcanic rocks. In recent models
their formation is connected with under-plating, following by
low-crust anatexis in condition of maximum fluid-saturated. Such
genesis is supposed for Uralian margin-continental
tonalite-granodiorite massifs conjugated with belt of
after-subduction granites (Fershtater, 2001).
Stopping
of subduction and continent-continent collision leads to crust
shortening and disturbance of crust thermal structure. The estimate
of collision duration on the base of real valuation of meeting plate
speed and orogen thermal evolution showed that thermal relaxation is
much more prolonged then collision. First of all the quartz-bearing
rocks is softening and switches on the post-collision stretch
process and only later the lifting of geoisotherms leads to
metamorphism and granite generation. The fluid deficit (which sours
may be hydro-content minerals and/or porous water in sediment
series) stipulates the generation of water under-saturated granite
magma and it is agrees with nature and experiment data (Wyllie,
1977). We are sure, that the reason of crust anatexis is
high-temperature metamorphism, but analysis of Urals orogen
metamorphic migmatite complexes demonstrated that there isn’t
the granite melt formation horizon on the modern erosion level.
Thus, the present-day general idea about autochthonous granite with
root zones migmatite is only traditional tribute.
The
concept on polycyclic evolution of Phanerozoic belts is founded on
the event recurrence postulate. Our idea of total geodynamic cycle
(Ivanov, Rusin, 1986) allows affirming, that granite generation in
collision orogens and in Late-Precambrian rifts of their previous
stage have great difference. In the present-day science level we can
suppose that the reason of periodical activization of Riphean and
Vendian endogenic process was pulse activity of deepest plumes
(“superplumes”) and connected earth crust uplifts
(“ensialic orogenies”). Such orogenies don’t
terminate, but precede to sediment basins formation. All signs of
folded orogenesis (discordances, molasses, metamorphism, granites)
can be found in rifting belts. Now it is known, that angular
discordances and molasses are the indispensable elements of
stretch-links sediment basins, rift metamorphism has a self specific
(Ivanov, Rusin, 1997) but the nature of Late-Precambrian granites in
Phanerozoic orogens is the object of debates. Nobody disputes their
belonging to anorogenic A-type, but in connection with popularity of
“super-continental cycles” there are opinions that great
batholiths of anorthosite-rapakivi-granite formation together with
high-pressure granulites contain batholiths can register the stages
of sialic mass confluence (e.g. “Rodinia”). That point
of view, in our opinion, is disputable and need of continued
discussion.
High-temperature
high-pressure metamorphism is not believed as indisputable evidence
of collision processes. In those belts the relic association of
middle-pressure granulites are constantly discovered and new-forming
paragenesises point to their forming in connection with ductile
(brittle-ductile) deformation, representative for continental rift
deep zones (Ivanov, Rusin, 1997). The disposal of
anorthosite-rapakivi-granite formation in areas with high thickness
Earth’s crust can be connected with plume underplating,
forming the substratum and supplying the energy for melting of dry
unorogenic magmas. At this interpretation we can say that
Precambrian rifting is not only destruction, but crust-forming
process, whereas the subduction plays the main role in new-forming
of Earth’s crust in Phanerozoic.
References
Ivanov S.N., Rusin A.I. Continental rift metamorphism
// Geotectonics, 1997. V. 31. N 1. P.3-15.
Miyashiro A., Aki K., Senor A.M.C. Orogeny. Chichester
– New-York. J. Wiley and Sons lmt. 1982. 242p.
Rusin A.I. Orogenic (collision ) metamorphism in the
Urals. Ekateriburg: UB RAS, 2007. P.63-74. (in Russian).
Fershtater G.B.
Granitoid magmatism and formation of Earth’s crust during
evolution of Urals orogen // Lithosphere, 2001. ¹ 1. P.62-85. (in
Russian).
Ivanov S.N., Rusin A.I.
Model for the evolution of the linear folds in the continents:
example of the Urals // Tectonophysics,
1986. N127. P.383-397.
Wyllie P.J. Crustal
anatexis: an experimental review // Tectonophysics,
1977. V.43. P.41-71.
|