Geodynamics OF external
LATERAL compression
and
structurization of THE PrimorYE’S Paleozoic granitic mASSIFS
Nevolin P.L., Utkin V.P., Mitrokhin A.N.
Far
East Geological Institute
FEB RAS, Vladivostok, Russia,
nevpeter@yandex.ru
The
formation of intrusions being usually synchronous with tectonic
and/or geodynamic activation
is postulated to take place in the conditions of intensive (in
comparison with inert periods) stress fields. It is enough to glance
just over a geological map of the Primorye Territory so as to draw
the conclusion that lengthening of the majority of granite massifs
is concordant with strike of folding. At the same time, the massifs’
structural geometry (with rare exception) is not investigated and so
the information about markings of external dynamic actions upon
intrusion geometry is extremely small. Some of heterogeneities of
the massifs are explained a
priori
by formation of the magmatic focus per
ce,
mostly reasoning from the point of view of direct or counter
zonality relative to the focus or contacts. However, the world
practice has adequately accumulated the information about
inconsistency of real structural patterns of magmatic bodies with
ideas of their focal self-development (Pons, Brun, 1979). This is
also confirmed by our geostructrual research of the Cretaceous
intrusions within the southern Prymorye (Nevolin et al., 2003).
The object of the present
study, whose results are given below, is geostructural patterns for
a number of the Paleozoic granite massifs sitting within south and
west of Primorye.
The regular structural geometry
is peculiar in full measure to the Tafuinsky massif of muscovite
granites experiencing maximal quantity of tectonic impulses. The
Tafuinsky granite massif is located on Livadiysky Peninsula (a
northern piece of a shore of Peter the Great Bay). The massif
consists of light grey, frequently pegmatoid granites. Their age is
dated as Ordovician – 491-493 Ma (Khanchuk, 1993).
In
addition to well-known structural methods we also used our in-house
techniques to recognize asymmetry and vergence of folded forms.
Geological maps, plans, and results of observations as well as dip
direction measurements for structural elements were analyzed.
Four
basic structural patterns forming architecture of the Tafuinsky
granite massifs are fixed. The 1st pattern is presented by
trajectories of protolith foliation; the 2nd one includes shadow
granitic lineation. As both are not synchronised with active
influence of external stresses, they are attributed by us to a
passive
type.
The 3rd pattern is formed by configuration of granitic bodies’
contacts with protoskeleton relics, and the 4th one consists of
aplite bodies of the second phase. Two last patterns are regarded as
an
active
type because
they
were formed under the lateral compression being synchronous with the
intrusion.
Both pattern types are essentially characterized
by the fold-shape structural outline
consisting of the folds of four orders, which are genetically in
relationship according to the experimental model of H. Ramberg
(1963).
The
active fold-related pattern is organized by systems of the conjugate
shears, kinematically – counter-dipping thrusts of 4 orders,
whose spatial combination forms fold-shaped polyhedrons. The genetic
hierarchy in such systems of the conjugate shears consists in the
point that, probably, further movements involve activation of the
part of shears that falls into zones of tangential displacements. To
put it differently, there was a tectonic stratification of host
rocks along the entire system of the low-angle shears (thrusts),
whose being under the further long compression caused their
crumpling that was essentially similar to contorting of layer packet
under a longitudinal compression. As a result, the system of
fold-and-thrust forms of several orders was formed with storage even
of the vergence type, i.e. it is available the shear analogue of
longitudinal folding that significantly influenced on distribution
of granitic substance along with replacement of the protoskeleton
structures by it. Therefore, it is nonrandom the fact that
orientation diagrams for elements of the passive and active patterns
are similar.
In
the same way the structures defining distribution of the aplites of
the 2nd phase were formed. They are marks the next impulse of
compression. Azimuthal reorientation of axes of normal compression
paleostresses is recognized. There occurred two impulses of
compression after the protoskeleton formation, as followed:
syngranitic and synaplitic. Both active patterns are products of the
NNE (10-15o)
longitudinal lateral compression (axes σ1,
and σ2
are
horizontal, σ3
is
vertical): the former resulted from ductile
deformations,
the latter arisen from brittle-and-ductile
ones.
There taken place the 10-15î
step-by-step turn of compression from syngranitic to synaplitic
impulses, thus, the total turn of compression came to 20-30î
ckw.
The
postgranitic deformations of two tectonic impulses taking place in
Late Permian and Mesozoic, accordingly, are shear-and-fold related
too. The Late Permian impulse (being recognized within the western
Primorye (Utkin et al., 2003)), is characterized by a latitudinal
compression. It wrinkled hinges of the preexisting WNW-trending
folds into crossing folds with development of the NS-trending
systems of counter-dipping thrusts. The Mesozoic impulse is
characterized by dominance of the NS- and NNE-trending sinistral
faults which was formed under the NNW lateral compression.
We
also dwell slightly on other intrusive massifs. Being westerly
contiguous with the Tafuinsky massif, the Annensky gabbroid massif
was formed under the near-latitudinal compression. It doesn’t
have signs of diversification.
Nevertheless, because of intensive
squeezing
the
gabbroids got definite the NS-trending foliation as well as taxitic
structure, and there vividly occur also the meridional
shear-and-fold related forms with horizontal hinges resulting from
the same compression. At that, hinge parts of antiforms are filled
by the Late Permian Rudnevsky pinkish granites. The Late Permian
latitudinal compression resulted also in structural position and
geometry of the Gamovsky granite intrusion keeping the distinctly
ordered NS orientation of its protoskeleton relics that is similar
with the Tafuinsky massif.
There
are at least ten examples of the Silurian and Late Permian (mainly)
as well as Cretaceous intrusions of the western part of Primorye,
whose structures are studied by us with a different minuteness. We
emphasize that all of them have the same structurally-geodynamic
signs as the Tafuinsky massif. In other words, they were formed
chiefly via replacement of host structural protoskeleton by
endogenic substance without force influence on environment.
Structurization of the intrusions was defined by external
longitudinal compression.
References
Khanchuk A.I.
Geological Structure and Development of a Continental Frame of the
Northwest Pacific Ocean: Abstract
of Doct. Thesis. Moscow: GIN RAS, 1993. 31p. (in Russian)
Nevolin P.L, Utkin V.P,
Mitrohin A.N., Kovalenko S.V., Kutub-Zade T.K. Cretaceous Intrusions
of the Southern Primorye: Tectonic Position, Structures, and
Dynamics of their Formation // Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya. 2003. V.
22, No. 5. P.73-86. (in Russian)
Pons J., Brun J.P. Les Structures Internes des
Granitoides: Tectonique et Ecoulement Magmatique? // 7e Reun. Annu.
Sci. Terre, Lyon, 1979. Paris. 379p.
Ramberg H. Evolution of Drag Fold // Geol. Mag. 1963.
V. 100, No 2.
Utkin V. P., Nevolin P.
L., Mitrokhin A. N. Two Deformation Patterns at the Eastern Flank of
the Jilin-Laoelin Fold System // Doklady Earth Sciences. 2003. V.
389, N 2. P.171-174.
|