KHANGAY BATHOLITH (CENTRAL
MONGOLIA):
GEOPHYSICAL
AND GEOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF FORMATION
Turutanov Е.Kh.*,
Grebenschikova V.I.**, Mordvinova V.V.*
*Institute
of the Earth’s Сrust
SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia, tur@crust.irk.ru
**Institute
of Geochemistry SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia, vgreb@igc.irk.ru
The
work was intended to identify the features of volumetric geometry
and geochemical composition of rocks of density heterogeneities of
granitic crust exemplified by the Khangay batholith - the largest
granitoid batholith of Asia. Decompensated anomalies were used for
interpretation of geophysical (gravimetric) data (Zorin et al.,
1985). It is reasonable to attract them because in these anomalies
the influence of local isostatic compensation is eliminated. It
deforms gravitation effects of geological units causing drop of
intensity.
The
calculations indicate that all great and smaller granite massifs,
located within the zone of low values of gravitation field, merge at
depth into one intrusive body. Its projection onto the Earth’s
surface is over 100 000 sq. km. The pluton extends for about 700 km,
with the width varying from 100 to 300 km (Fig. 1). Its vertical
thickness varies along the strike from 2 to 15 km, making up on
average 5-7 km.
Fig. 1. Scheme
of isolines to show thickness of the Khangay granitoid batholith: 1-
granitoids Pz; 2 - granitoids Mz; 3 – contours of batholith
projection onto the Earth’s surface; 4 – isolines of
thickness, km; 5 – lines of interpreted sections.
The pluton has steep contacts
in the south-west and gentle contacts in the north-east. The
intrusive body represents a sizable slab with intricately
constructed base and subhorizontal roof. It is hard to attribute it
to a certain shape of intrusive bodies, although considering the
interpreted sections it is close to lopolite-like. The data on
volumetric modeling suggest that specific feature of morphology of
granite bodies located within the Khangay field of granitoids is
that they are flat-shaped on the vertical line, though on some sites
thickness of these bodies reaches 15 km. Configuration of the
batholith shape is defined by a network of large faults, with the
maximum thickness at the intersection sites.
The rocks of the Khangay
batholith vary in composition from gabbro to leucogranites and
display the trend of normal alkalinity.
On
the norm-corresponding diagram albite-quartz-orthoclase the
displacement of granodiorite composition points to the orthoclase
angle indicate the initially cotectic granitoid melt and mesabyssal
level of its formation (approximately at depth 15 km), which is
confirmed by geophysical data. The compositions of granites and
leucogranites are mostly approached to eutectic (Fig. 2). A gradual
transition of granitoid composition proceeds from deeper varieties
(diorites) to less deep (granodiorites and granites).
Diversity
of batholith rock compositions and available geochemical data on the
distribution of potassium and rubidium contents (Fig. 3) and their
correlation between each other represent evidence on duration of
granitoid melt differentiation and, possibly, long-term emplacement
of the Khangay batholith.
The
pattern of distribution of different elements in granodiorites of
the Khangay batholith and comparison with the bulk composition of
continental crust showed that their compositions lie within the area
of the upper-middle continental crust, and the deep-seated source,
which caused melting, could occur in the middle crust.
The work was supported by the Integration
project SB RAS № 6.17.
Fig.
2.
Diagram of
albite-quartz-orthoclase for granitoids of the Khangay batholith.
1 – diorite,
quartz diorite; 2 – granodiorite; 3 – granite; 4
– leucogranite.
|
Fig. 3.
Variation diagram, Rb
– K for rocks of Khangay batholith. Compositions (Taylor,
McLennan, 1985): lower crust (I),
upper crust (III),
bulk composition of continental crust (II).
Rock: 1 – gabbro, 2 –
diorite, quartz diorite, 3 – granodiorite, 4 – granite,
5 – leucogranite,6 – syenite.
|
References
Zorin Yu.А.,
Pismenny B.М.,
Novosjolova М.R.,
Turutanov Е.KhХ.
Decompensated anomalies of gravity // Geology and Geophsyics, 1985,
№8. P.104-108.
|