SPATIAL-TEMPORAL
ZONATION OF GRANITOID COMPLEX PETROPHYSICAL CLASS
DISTRIBUTION
IN EAST PRE-AZOV (THE UKRAINIAN SHIELD) AS REFLECTION OF CHANGE IN
GEODYNAMIC SETTINGS OF THEIR FORMATION
Shabatura A.V.
Kiev
State University named after Taras Shevchenko, Kiev, Ukraine,
sand@univ.kiev.ua
The
East
Pre-Azov is one of the most considerable and interesting areas of the
Ukrainian Shield. On comparatively small territory there are polytype
and hetero-aged magmatic, metamorphic and metasomatic formations.The
long history of this region development have caused a variety of
compositions, structures, physical properties of rocks, etc.
The
so called lateral
zonation of the Early Proterozoic magmatism, which can be the proof
of the Andian type active continental margin existence was
established by numerous researchers (Kalyaev, 1995; Glevassky,
Kalyaev, 2000). The successive latitudinal change in matter
composition, geochemical and metallogenic peculiarities (Shcherbak et
al., 2003; Shcherbak, Ponomarenko, 2000; Shcherbakov, 2000),
including the petrophysical classes of rocks, etc. has been noted.
For Pre-Azov region, the azimuthal extension of overthrust coincides
with direction of updating the isotopic data (from north-west to
south-east) (Shcherbak, Ponomarenko, 2000) (Fig. 1.).
Fig.1. The
zonation of granitoid complex petrophysical class distribution in
East Pre-Azov: unconsolidated rocks are in white colour, –
compressed rocks - grey, metamorphic rocks- yellow, basic and
ultrabasic rocks – in black one; areas of high oxygen fugacity
(fO2)
-with the green shading, the boundaries of conditional rocks’
depth (b – abyss,
c –middle,
m - small,
om – very small -
hypabyssal) - red
line with intersection and codes,
petrophysical class
zones of development
(main representatives:
I – elanchiksky and kalmiusky granosyenites, II –
dmitrovsky granite; III – kalmiusky quartz-syenite, tokmaksky
granodiorite; IV – anadolsky granite and maksimovsky
leucogranite; V – kremnevsky syenite; VI – obitochnensky
tonalite, VII – kremenevsky quartz-syenite)
- Roman numerals.
The
determination of petrophysical
classes as indicators of change in geodynamic (only collisional and
postcollisional regimes are more or less obviously presented) is
based on studying the conformable changes in a number of
petrophysical parameters: bulk density, calculated from mineral
composition,
and crystal-chemical
density, elastic properties and their correlations, acoustic hardness
of rocks, bulk and effective porosities and also some petrochemical
indexes (Tolstoi
et al., 2003).
The
first petrophysical class is presented by
the high-porous, low-density, by high fO2,
hypabyssal formation with
high fO2.
The second one is represented by the low-density,
very high-porous, radioactive and greatly friable, plastically
deformed formations at volumous extension, with low fO2.
The third class is similar to the first one, except the higher
crystal-chemical density and very low index of oxygen chemical
activity. The fourth class is the most heterogeneous one that is
differed by considerable variance of practically all petrophysical
parameters, as well mesoabyssal depths. The fifth class is
characterized by the promoted crystal-chemical density, lower fO2
and middle porosity. The sixth class is high-density and high
elastic, hypabyssal rocks with low fO2.
The seventh class is high-density, hypabyssal, low-oxidized rocks
with considerable
anisotropies
of elastic properties.
The
east part of the
Pre-Azov megablock was welded to the existing Paleo-Archean continent
in the subsequent stages of formation, and the synkinematic diorites
(obitochnensky complex), the anatectic granitoids and migmatites
(anadolsky complex), which made up the basic canvas of region were
already formed in the Paleo-Proterozoic (Kalyaev,
1995; Glevassky, Kalyaev, 2000).
Paleo-Proterozoic intrusive formations tectonically associated with
deep faults were intruded in 2 episodes of post-orogenic
tectono-magmatic activation: 1) Chernigovsky complex of
carbonatites, Khlebodarovsky complex of intrusive charnockites,
Saltychansky complex of intrusive granites; 2) South Kalchitsky
complex of gabbro-syenites, Kamennomogilsky complex of subalkaline
granites, Octyabrsky alkaline complex (Shcherbak
et al., 2003; Shcherbak, Ponomarenko, 2000; Shcherbakov, 2000).
The geodynamic regime was caused by paleotectonics of the region, and
its specific features of geodynamics are the following: a) there are
uplifted
south-western and northern-east blocks, with the relatively subsided
ones among them;
b) cross-like diagonal
area
of consolidated rocks
in the matrix of the unconsolidated formations;
c) presence
of meridionally oriented belts of oxygen high chemical activity and
latitudinal change in values of density and other petrophysical
properties, etc.
The
above features allow to identify paleogeodynamical settings (active
continental margin and subsequent
collisional area), which are the reflections of the ocean plate
overthrust differentiated by rates and direction under the Pre-Azov
megablock. Also, more careful petrophysical analysis will allow to
reconstruct their paleotectonical elements: plutonic belts, rear
areas of extension that have different physical and matter
characteristics.
References
Glevassky E.B., Kalyaev G.I. (2000) Tectonics of
Pre-Cambrian UShCh // Mineralogical journal. 22. N2/3.
Kalyaev G.I. (1995) Paleotectonic reconstructions //
Mineralogical journal. 17. N6.
Shcherbak N.P.,
Ponomarenko A.N. (2000) Age succession of volcanism and granitoid
magmatism processes in the Ukranian schield // Mineralogical journal.
V.22. N2/3.
Shcherbak N.P., Bibikov
E.V., Skobelev V.M., Shcherbak D.N. (2003) Evolution in time and
metallogenic specialization of the Ukranian schield Early
Pre-Cambrian crust (3,7 – 1,7 Ga) // Mineralogical journal.
V.25. N4.
Shcherbakov I.B. (2000) Evolution of the Ukranian
schield magmatism // Mineralogical journal. V.22. N2/3.
Tolstoi M.L., Gasanov
Yu.L., Kostenko N.V. (2003) та
ін.
Петрогеохімія і петрофізика гранітоїдів
Українського щита та деякі аспекті їх практичного використання:
Довідник-навчальний посібник. К.: ВПЦ «Київський університет»,
2003. 329с.
|