DEEP
PECULIARITIES OF THE COLLISIONAL GRANITOIDAL MAGMATISM IN THE AMUR
AND EURASIAN LITHOSPHERIC PLATES JUNCTION ZONE
Shevchenko B.F.
Yu. A. Kosygin Institute of
Tectonics and Geophysics FEB RAS, Khabarovsk, Russia
shevchenko@itig.as.khb.ru
Modern
tectonic plates of the continental lithosphere are composed of
tectonic elements of different age. Particularly, the Amur plate is
formed, in the first place, by the Paleozoic and Mesozoic orogenic
structures (Parfenov, 2003). Mesozoic magmatism is widely spread in
the entire of its area. It is represented to a significant
extent as by volcano-plutonic belts (VPB) so by granitoidal intrusive
belts (Romanovskii, 1999).
Further
geochemical and geochronological studies (in the first place, along
the northwestern and northern boundaries between the Amur and
Eurasian plates) provided verification of the time parameters of the
granitoidal belts. These studies allowed the assumption on a rather
continuous collisional process of the Amur super terrane (the Amur
paleoplate). After closure of the Mongolo-Okhotsk Ocean the northern
boundary between the plates was formed no later than the Early
Triassic at its western and central segments and no later than Mid-
and Late Jurassic at the eastern one (Sorokin, 2005). The Amur plate
has been formed in its contemporary structure no later than Middle
Miocene (Fundamental problems…, 2001).
In
all probability, duration and discreteness of the collisional process
occurring between the Amur and Eurasian lithospheric plates led to
the fact that the granitoidal magmatism differs as to its
petrochemical
and petrophysical parameters within the plates and at their
boundaries. It should be expected that deep characteristics of the
crust, in particular, and the lithosphere, entirely, will be
distinguished by specific peculiarities.
The
Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous Stanovoy batholith belt was chosen for
the study. The belt is located within the Stanovoy granite-greenstone
area (Tectonics, deep…, 2005). The age of one of the
batholiths of this belt is 1271
Ma (Sorokin, 2005). There have been constructed 3-D models of the
surface of the crust and of the lithosphere, 3-D and 2-D-density
models, data on geoelectrical modeling of results of magnetotelluric
soundings were involved.
It
follows from the analysis of 3-D depth model that the Stanovoy
batholith belt passes along the deep boundary between the Amur and
Eurasian tectonic plates (Fig. 1). Plane of boundary dipping is
directed beneath the Eurasian plate, and the batholith belt is
controlled by this deep element of the lithosphere. The thickness
reduction of the lithosphere to 60-70 km is characteristic of the
belt, the seismic conversion wave boundaries are absent at the
lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (depths to 120 km). This
phenomenon testifies to the fact that up till now the substance of
the lithosphere is in a more plastic state in this area. Probably,
these areas caused the formation of the collisional granitoids within
the crust along the boundaries of tectonic plate junction.
Fig. 1.
Geological-structural sketch-map of the study area (borrowed from
Karsakov L.P. with co-authors “Tectonics, deep structure….”,
2005, simplified).
Sedimentary basins: 1 -
Cenozoic, 2 - Mesozoic; 3 – fragments of Mesozoic volcanites; 4
– Mesozoic collisional granites of the Stanovoy batholith belt;
faults: 5 - interblock, 6 - intrablock, 7 – those overlain by
sedimentary deposits; 8 – names of faults: St – Stanovoy,
Dzh - Dzheltulak, N-T – North-Tukuringra, S-Т-
South-Tukuringra. 9 – numbers of main tectonic structures
(Aldan-Stanovoy Shield: 1-1 - Olekma granite-greenstone area, 1-2
–Aldan granulite-gneiss area; 2 – Stanovoy
granite-greenstone area. Central Asian Tectonic Belt: block of the
Selenga-Stanovoy Caledonian orogenic belt: 3-1 - Tungir, 3-2 -
Mogocha; 4 – Argun-Mamyn massif (microcontinent); 5 –
North Hinggan Caledonian orogenic belt; 6 - Jiagdachi
massif; 7 -
Silamulun-Yienben Hercynian orogenic belt; 8 -
Turan-Zhangguangcailing massif (microcontinent); 9 -
Jiamusi-Malohinggan massif (microcontinent); 10 –
Mongolo-Okhotsk Late Paleozoic-Mesozoic orogenic belt); 10 –
contemporary boundary of tectonic plates convergence (EA - Eurasian,
AM - Amur); 11 – dipping direction for the boundary of plate
convergence; 12 – isopachs of the lithosphere, km; 13 –
line of the profile under study; 14 – outline of the study area
on the tectonic zoning scheme (insert).
The
structure of the depth section and the calculated geophysical
parameters, up to the outcrop at the surface,
affirm the assumption made: Areas with increased electric
conductivity are determined within the lithosphere (70-90 km depths)
and at the crust-mantle boundary (37-42 km depths). On the whole, it
is observed specific echeloning of the anomalous seismic and
geoelectrical anomalous objects by depth. Farther, within the crust,
this specific column is distinguished by the calculated density
values. Within the lower crust (20-40 km) it is a value of 2.86 g/cm3
at the background of 2.91 – 2.92 g/cm3,
in the upper crust (10-20 km) – 2.77 g/cm3
at the background of 2.86 g/cm3
and in the upper crust (0-10 km) – 2.74 g/cm3
at he background of 2.77 – 2.86 g/cm3
(Tectonics, deep…, 2005). The similar deep density structure
is traced along the strike of the batholith belt under study.
The work is supported by the
grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research 07-05-00726 and
grant of the Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
06-1-DES-110.
References
Parfenov L.M., Berzin
N.A., Khanchuk A.I. et al. Model of the formation of orogenic belts
of Central and Northeastern
Asia //Tikhookeanskaya geologiya, 2003. V. 22. No. 6. P.7-41. (in
Russian).
Romanovskii N.P. Pacific
segment of the Earth: deep structure, granitoidal ore-magmatic
systems. Khabarovsk:
ITIG DVO RAN, 1999. 167p. (in Russian).
Sorokin A.A. Geodynamic
evolution of the eastern segment of the Mongolo-Okhotsk foldbelt.
Saint-Petersburg: IGIG of Precambrian, RAN, Sc. D. (Geol. &
Mineral) Thesis, 2005. 48p.(In Russian).
Tectonics, deep
structure, metallogeny of the Central Asian and Pacific belts
junction area (explanatory notes to the Tectonic map scale of 1: 1
500 000), Vladivostok – Khabarovsk: DVO RAN, 2005. 264p. (in
Russian).
Fundamental problems of
tectonics. M.: Nauchny mir, 2001. 520p.
(in
Russian).
|